Wilson, Gregory P. Primary Author mixed material bibliography TRB 1994 en English

Computer Software

p3-9 Trr No. 1462 Soils, Geology, And Foundations, pp. 3-9 The results of a survey of several large onstruction companies in the southwestern United States revealed that antractors have a great deal of experience with scalp-and-replace rock arrection methods and apparently not as much experience with rock ,nrection equations, particularly in highway work. Although contrac,r, may tend to have most of their experience with scalp-and-replace ,ethods, many engineering testing firms tend toward the use of rock ,rrection equations. Given the significant variation in computed rela e compaction that can arise from the different rock correction methd.. well-written compaction specifications for high gravel content ,ils, explicitly stating the technique for rock correction in compaction mtrol, are a must. An understanding of the potential differences in ),,k correction methods. by contractors and engineers alike, should duce conflicts and future problems with the compacted fill. SOIL COMPACTION 625.7(047.31) Perpustakaan Direktorat Bina Teknik Jalan dan Jembatan Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga - Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum (NPP: 3273244A00000001) 0000004399 My Library 4175 machine generated